A Clinical Comparison of Dacron Patch Closure of Small-Caliber Carotids Compared with Primary Closure of Large-Caliber Carotids after Endarterectomy

Author:

Bhattacharya Vishwanath1,Ghali Rafik1,El-Massry Sherif1,Saad Ehab1,Zammit Michael1,Rodriguez Dirk1,Spencer Merrill P.12,Sauvage Lester R.12

Affiliation:

1. The Hope Heart Institute, The Providence Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

2. Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

The objective was to study results of carotid endarterectomies performed between 1975 and 1991, comparing primary closure to Dacron patch closure. This was a retrospective study. Data from patient follow-up by physical examination, chart review, and Duplex study were used. Scan data were obtained in 92 of the primary cases, at a mean of 5 years postoperatively, and in 63 of the patch cases, at a mean of 4.1 years postoperatively. During this period, 269 endarterectomies were closed primarily and 101 were closed with a knitted Dacron patch. Twenty patients in the primary group and nine patients with patch closure were lost to follow-up, which extended for up to 12.5 years, with a mean of 4.7 ± 3.6 years. No acute closures, infections or aneurysms developed in either group. Perioperative stroke incidence was 4.1 per cent for primary closure and 3.0 per cent for the patch group (P > 0.05). Late stenosis occurred in 17.3 per cent of the primary group and 11.1 per cent of the patch closure group (P > 0.05). Five-year survival was 76.2 per cent in the primary group, compared with 79.2 per cent for patch closure. Late stroke incidence was 2.8 per cent in the primary group and 3.3 per cent in the patch closure group. Results of smaller (≤3.5 mm) carotid arteries closed with knitted Dacron patches are equivalent to those of larger carotid arteries closed primarily.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3