The National Resident Matching Program: An Outdated Business Model Due for Reform

Author:

Nasef Hazem1,Awan Muhammad Usman1,Hernandez Nickolas2,Cruz Francis3,Havron Will45,Elkbuli Adel45

Affiliation:

1. Kiran Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

2. William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, MS, USA

3. University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA

4. Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA

5. Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA

Abstract

Introduction This study aims to examine the trends across the entire NRMP application cycles from 2007-2008 to 2022-2023, specifically exploring trends across competitive surgical specialties to assess the efficacy of the existing NRMP business model and provide evidence-based recommendations to better address the current needs of both applicants and programs. Methods A cross-sectional study exploring the trends in the mean number of applicants and mean number of total ranked positions per applicant across surgical, the top 5 most competitive surgical specialties, and non-surgical specialties from 2007-2008 to the 2022-2023 match cycles utilizing data from the NRMP database. Results Over the studied 16 match cycles, the mean number of applicants to surgical specialties has increased by 47.99% and the mean number of total ranked positions per applicant has increased by 88.07%. For the top 5 most competitive specialties, the mean number of applicants has increased by 57.66% and the mean number of total ranked positions per applicant has increased by 83.33%. Conclusion Trends across the 16 most recent NRMP cycles show evidence of increased congestion in the match system, the burden of which is primarily placed on applicants. Our findings support the need for drastic reform in the NRMP to relieve this burden, and we discuss practical solutions to allow the NRMP to better meet the needs of applicants and residency programs alike.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. The US Residency Match at 70: What Was, What Is, and What Could Be

2. CaRMS at 50: Making the match for medical education

3. Residency Data and Reports. NRMP. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data-analytics/residency-data-reports/. Accessed July 9, 2023

4. American College of Surgeons. What are the surgical specialties? ACS. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/online-guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency/guide-to-choosing-a-surgical-residency-for-medical-students/faqs/specialties/. Accessed July 13, 2023

5. Trends in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Match: Analysis of NRMP Data from 2007 to 2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3