Non-Procedural Dispute Resolution: Study of the Restorative Justice Approach Tradition in Indonesian Society

Author:

Hamzani Achmad Irwan1ORCID,Aryani Fajar Dian1,Bawono Bambang Tri2,Khasanah Nur3,Yunus Nur Rohim4

Affiliation:

1. Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Central Java, Indonesia

2. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

3. Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Central Java, Indonesia

4. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia

Abstract

The Indonesian Muslim community is familiar with restorative justice. The substance of restorative justice is building joint participation between perpetrators and victims through third parties. The objectives of this study are: to describe restorative justice in the traditions of Indonesian Muslim society and to examine the relevance of restorative justice for the settlement of criminal cases in the future. This research uses a philosophical approach, namely legal construction at an ideal level in the future. The results show that the restorative justice approach has strong roots in Indonesian Muslim society, namely deliberation to reach a consensus. Deliberative institutions are held to find solutions that can satisfy all parties. In the future, restoration justice needs to be applied in Indonesia in resolving criminal cases, especially crimes against life. The restorative justice approach offers a different view from the approach applied in the current criminal system.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Atmasasmita R. (2001). Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia dan Penegakan Hukum [Legal reform, human rights and law enforcement]. Bandar Maju. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20252829

2. Barnes B. E. (2007). Culture, conflict, and mediation in the Asian Pacific. University of America Press. https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Conflict-Mediation-Asian-Pacific/dp/0761834451

3. Braithwaite J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press. http://johnbraithwaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Restorative-Justice-and-Responsive-regulation-book.pdf

4. Restorative Justice and De-Professionalization

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3