Pooled Analysis of the CONFIRM Registries

Author:

Lee Michael S.1,Canan Timothy1,Rha Seung-Woon2,Mustapha Jihad3,Adams George L.4

Affiliation:

1. UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea

3. Metro Health Hospital, Wyoming, MI, USA

4. Rex Healthcare, Raleigh, NC, USA

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the acute procedure and angiographic outcomes of peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients treated with orbital atherectomy stratified by gender. Methods: The CONFIRM I, II, and III registries are US multicenter, nonrandomized, all-comers registries of PAD patients who were treated with orbital atherectomy. All patients with gender specified in the registry database were included in the current analysis, which compared the final residual stenosis achieved after atherectomy and the rate of acute complications in female and male patients. The 3 registries included 3131 patients with 4761 lesions: 1261 women (mean age 73.2±10.7 years) with 1874 lesions and 1870 men (mean age 70.4±10.2) with 2887 lesions. Results: The women were older (p<0.001) and had a higher but nonsignificant prevalence of critical limb ischemia (p=0.075). After treatment, the final residual stenosis in women vs. men was 9%±11% vs. 11%±11%, respectively (p<0.001). Women had a higher rate of all types of dissection (13.3% vs. 9.9%, p<0.001). However, both genders had similar rates of flow-limiting dissections (1.6% vs. 1.4%, p=0.61), perforation, slow flow, vessel closure, spasm, embolism, and thrombus formation. Conclusion: The gender analysis of the CONFIRM registries revealed that there was successful lesion modification with orbital atherectomy in both men and women; however, women had a higher rate of dissection (all types). This difference is likely because of the older age and higher percentage of critical limb ischemia in women in this cohort. These results, however, suggest that additional studies should be completed to further understand the increased risks for women vs. men during endovascular procedures.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3