Chocolate Touch Versus Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions in Diabetes: The Chocolate Touch Study

Author:

Böhme Tanja1,Zeller Thomas1,Shishehbor Mehdi H.2ORCID,Werner Martin3,Brodmann Marianne4ORCID,Parise Helen5,Holden Andrew6ORCID,Lichtenberg Michael7,Parikh Sahil A.8,Kashyap Vikram S.9ORCID,Pietras Cody5,Tirziu Daniela5,Beschorner Ulrich1,Krishnan Prakash10ORCID,Niazi Khusrow A.11,Wali Andreas U.12,Lansky Alexandra J.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany

2. University Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA

3. Department of Angiology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria

4. Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

6. Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

7. Arnsberg Vascular Center, Arnsberg, Germany

8. Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA

9. Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

10. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

11. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

12. Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center, Camp Hill, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: The randomized Chocolate Touch Study demonstrated that in patients undergoing treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions, the Chocolate Touch drug-coated balloon (DCB) was safe and had superior efficacy at 12 months compared with the Lutonix DCB. We report the prespecified diabetes subanalysis comparing outcomes among patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: Patients with claudication or ischemic rest pain (Rutherford class 2–4) were randomized to Chocolate Touch or Lutonix DCB. The primary efficacy endpoint was DCB success defined as primary patency at 12 months (peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 by duplex ultrasound without clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the absence of bailout stenting). The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events at 12 months, a composite of target limb-related death, major amputation, or reintervention. Results: A total of 313 patients (38% DM [n=119]) were randomized to either Chocolate Touch (n=66/152) or Lutonix DCB (n=53/161). Among patients with DM, DCB success was 77.2% and 60.5% (p=0.08), and in non-DM patients, DCB success was 80% and 71.3% (p=0.2114) for the Chocolate Touch and Lutonix DCB, respectively. The primary safety endpoint was similar for both cohorts regardless of DM status (interaction test, p=0.96). Conclusions: This randomized trial demonstrated similar safety and efficacy for the treatment of femoropopliteal disease with the Chocolate Touch DCB compared with using the Lutonix DCB regardless of DM status at 12 months. Clinical Impact This substudy of the Chocolate Touch Study demonstrated similar safety and efficacy for treatment of femoropopliteal disease of the Chocolate Touch DCB compared with the Lutonix DCB regardless of diabetes (DM) status at 12 months. Endovascular therapy has become the therapy of choice for the treatment of most symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions regardless of DM status. These results give clinicians another option when treating femoropopliteal disease in this high-risk patient population.

Funder

TriReme Medical

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3