Blood Standards and Failed Fluids: Clinic, Lab, and Transfusion Solutions in London, 1868

Blood Standards and Failed Fluids: Clinic, Lab, and Transfusion Solutions in London, 1868–1916

Published:2001-06 Issue:2 Volume:39 Page:185-213
ISSN:0073-2753
Container-title:History of Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Hist Sci

Author:

Pelis Kim¹

Affiliation:

1. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda

Abstract

It seems obvious that blood itself is the most appropriate fluid to replace blood, and there is no doubt as to its efficacy. On the other hand, to my surprise, it has not shown itself, experimentally, to be so much superior to certain artificial solutions, such as gum arabic, as I expected.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,History

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/007327530103900203

Reference64 articles.

1. Bayliss William, Intravenous injection in wound shock (London, 1918), 20.

2. Experiments on the Transfusion of Blood by the Syringe

3. Future uncertain for reliable vCJD screening tests

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dracula, Blood, and the New Woman: Stoker’s Reflections on the Zeitgeist;Blood;2022-06-30

2. Transfusion;2019-09-26

3. Towards cultural materialism in the medical humanities: the case of blood rejuvenation;Medical Humanities;2017-05-11

4. Blood transfusion at the time of the First World War - practice and promise at the birth of transfusion medicine;Transfusion Medicine;2014-12

5. Blood transfusion; additional historical aspects. Part 2. The introduction of chemical anticoagulants; trials of ‘Phosphate of soda’;Transfusion Medicine;2013-09-12