Impact of Religious Values and Medical Specialty on Professional Inservice Decisions

Author:

Neumann Joseph K.1,Leppien Frederick V.1

Affiliation:

1. Veterans Administration Medical Center James H. Quillen College of Medicine Johnson City, Tennessee

Abstract

Research indicates that professional group and religion affect decision making. Five hundred board-certified physicians from each of 5 specialty areas (General Surgery, Psychiatry, Internal Medicine, Pathology, and Family Practice) were mailed vignettes reflecting 1 of 4 value systems (Evangelical Christian, Liberal Protestant, Humanist, or Hindu) in a randomized survey. One hundred twenty-five vignettes of every value system were mailed to each specialty yielding a total of 500 per specialty. Respondents were asked to rate 1 vignette which provided a brief description of a professional inservice. Questions for rating covered approval and interest in the training as well as requests for respondent descriptive information. About 40% of the total group responded. Humanist and Hindu vignettes were clearly more approved than Liberal Protestant and Evangelical Christian (EC) vignettes. Medical specialty was not an independent factor but was significant in interaction with value type. Personal interest/value similarity correlated highly with approval ratings. Dissimilarity with parental religious values was a frequent moderating variable and varied significantly among medical specialty groups. Religious values influence medical nonclinical decisions. Implications concerning separation of church and state issues, research strategy, and medical ethical and training activities were discussed to encourage more openness in the area of medical decisions and theistic/non-theistic religious values.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Religious studies

Reference44 articles.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Metaphysical Diversity in Mental Health Discourse: The Key to Scientific Progress in the Helping Professions;Spiritual Psychology and Counseling;2021-11-14

2. Secular Privilege: Deconstructing the Invisible Rose‐Tinted Sunglasses;Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought;2009-02-27

3. Learning to Hear Each Others' Voice: A Response to Melendez and LaSala;Social Work;2007-10-01

4. When 2–3% really matters: The (un)importance of religiosity in psychotherapy;Mental Health, Religion & Culture;2007-08-08

5. Religious Discrimination and Ethical Compliance;Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought;2007-06-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3