“Defund” or “Refund” the Police?: City Council Responsiveness to the Black Lives Matter Protests

Author:

Hoang Bai Linh1ORCID,Benjamin Andrea2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA

2. The Clara Luper Department of African & African American Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

Abstract

In this research note, we investigate the degree to which local governments reduced or expanded the budgets of police departments in the aftermath of the nation-wide protests organized by the Black Lives Matter movement during the summer of 2020. We also consider the political and social factors that might explain local councils’ decisions on the budget. In analyzing an original dataset of about 100 of the most populous U.S. cities, we do not find strong evidence of government efforts to “defund” the police. However, across various specifications of potential responsiveness to the movement's demands, we do find that mayoral partisanship may be associated with local government decisions to meaningfully reduce their police budgets or abstain from increasing them, but even this relationship may not be sustained in the longer term. Thus, we encourage more research on barriers that potentially inhibit local government responsiveness to social movements like Black Lives Matter.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urban Studies,Sociology and Political Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Akinnibi Fola, Holder Sarah, Cannon Christopher. 2021. “Cities Say They Want to Defund the Police. Their Budgets Say Otherwise.” Bloomberg CityLab, January 12. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-city-budget-police-funding/

2. Local Interests

3. The role of officer race and gender in police-civilian interactions in Chicago

4. Ballotpedia. "List of Current Mayors of the Top 100 Cities in the United States, 2020." Web Archive. https://ballotpedia.org/List_of_current_mayors_of_the_top_100_cities_in_the_United_States

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3