Efficacy and safety comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication between vonoprazan dual therapy versus triple therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Wang Zheyu1,Wang Fen2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, ChinaHunan Key Laboratory of Non-Resolving Inflammation and Cancer, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Non-Resolving Inflammation and Cancer, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 138 Tongzi Road, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. ChinaHunan Key Laboratory of Non-Resolving Inflammation and Cancer, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

Abstract

Background: As a novel drug, vonoprazan (VPZ) has been developed as a new strategy against Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori) infections. However, whether VPZ + amoxicillin (AMO) dual therapy has a clear advantage is still unclear. Objective: To review and meta-analyze the available literature investigating the efficacy and safety of H. pylori eradication in VPZ dual therapy. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Data sources and methods: We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, EIsevier/Science Library, and Cochrane Library databases from 2015 to 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the actual cure rate and the incidence rate of adverse reactions in dual therapy and VPZ + AMO + clarithromycin (CLA) triple therapy; furthermore, eradication rates in CLA-resistant infections and different doses of antibiotics were evaluated in subgroup analysis. Results: Seven studies with 1490 patients were included in this meta-analysis. According to intention-to-treat analysis, the actual cure rates of VPZ dual and triple therapy were 82.8% and 84.6%, respectively [ p = 0.29, odds ratio (OR): 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–1.14]. And in the per-protocol analysis, the actual cure rates of these two therapies were 84.8% and 87.0%, respectively ( p = 0.21, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57–1.13). The incidence of adverse reactions between VPZ dual and triple therapy was 26.1% versus 29.6% ( p = 0.04, OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61–0.99). In subgroup analysis, the eradication rates in CLA-resistant infections were dual therapy: 85.7% for VPZ versus 71.0% for triple therapy ( p = 0.03, OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.10–5.05). And the actual cure rate of VPZ with high-dose antibiotics was lower than with low-dose antibiotics ( p = 0.000 in dual therapy; p = 0.011 in triple therapy). Conclusion: A combination of VPZ and a low dose of AMO should be prioritized as a treatment option for H. pylori eradication. Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42022346100.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3