Increased modified DUBLIN scores are associated with serious ulcerative colitis and treatment failure

Author:

Liu Lupeng1,Ouyang Hui2,Su Jingling1,Lin Yumei1,Hu Yiqun1,Shi Huaxiu1,Xie Chenxi3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China

2. Department of Digestive Medicine Center, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, ShenZhen, Guandong, China

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Hubin South Road 201-209, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China

Abstract

Background: Grading of endoscopic lesions is important for determining the severity of ulcerative colitis and developing treatment strategies, but the commonly used methods are not sufficient. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether new endoscopic scoring systems incorporating lesions and disease extent are associated with clinical disease severity and maintainable remission. Design: This was a retrospective study. In all, 110 patients with ulcerative colitis were included and 87 completed 12-month follow-up. Methods: Colonoscopy was performed within 1 week before blood samples were taken. Degree of ulcerative colitis burden of luminal inflammation (DUBLIN) scores were calculated as the product of Mayo endoscopic score (MES) by disease extent and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity was used to replace MES when calculating modified DUBLIN scores. Results: DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN scores were increased in the moderate and severe groups significantly ( p < 0.05). Both of increased scores contributed to the detection of serious diseases, and the clinical cutoff values of DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN were 3[area under the curve (AUC) = 0.809, p = 0.001) and 7(AUC = 0.815, p = 0.001), respectively. They were with high sensitivity, but the specificity of DUBLIN was lower. Both scores were correlated to partial Mayo scores, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate positively, and they were correlated to the albumin negatively ( p < 0.05). Higher modified DUBLIN scores (>7) were associated with an increased risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio = 4.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.17–21.00, p = 0.03), but there were no association between DUBLIN scores and long-term remission ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: Increased DUBLIN and modified DUBLIN scores were conducive to screening serious disease, but only modified DUBLIN scores had the potential to assist in making an upgraded therapeutic schedule.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3