Outcomes of esophagectomy after noncurative endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer

Author:

Dermine Solène12ORCID,Leconte Mahaut3,Leblanc Sarah1,Dousset Bertrand23,Terris Benoit24,Berger Arthur5,Berger Anne26,Rahmi Gabriel25,Lepilliez Vincent7,Plomteux Olivier8,Leclercq Philippe9,Coriat Romain12,Chaussade Stanislas12,Prat Frédéric12,Barret Maximilien10

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

2. Paris Descartes University, Paris, France

3. Department of Digestive Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

4. Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

5. Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

6. Department of Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

7. Gastroenterology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France

8. Department of Gastroenterology, Les Cliniques Saint Joseph, Liège, Belgium

9. Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège, Belgium

10. Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, 27, Rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014 Paris, France

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend performing esophagectomy after endoscopic resection for early esophageal cancer when the risk of lymph node metastasis or residual cancer is found to be significant and endoscopic treatment is therefore noncurative. Our aim was to assess the safety and oncological outcomes of esophagogastric resection in this specific clinical setting. Patients and methods: A retrospective review from 2012 to 2018 was performed at four tertiary referral centers. All patients had a noncurative endoscopic resection of a clinical T1 esophageal cancer, followed by esophagectomy. Outcome measures were the rates of T0N0 specimens, overall survival, disease-free and cancer-specific survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 30 patients (13 with squamous cell carcinoma and 17 with adenocarcinoma) were included. The reasons for noncurative endoscopic resection were: positive vertical margins ( n = 12), squamous cell carcinoma with muscularis mucosae or submucosal layer invasion ( n = 3 and 9), adenocarcinoma with deep submucosal invasion ( n = 11), poorly differentiated tumor ( n = 6) and lymphovascular invasion ( n = 6). Overall, 63% of the esophagi were T0N0: most residual lesions were T1a metachronous lesions, and four (13%) patients had advanced pT status ( n = 3) or lymph node metastases ( n = 2). Overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 83%, 75%, and 90% respectively. A total of 43% of patients had severe postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality was 7%. Conclusion: In this cohort, esophagectomy allowed the resection of residual advanced cancer or lymph node metastases in 13% of cases, at the cost of 43% severe morbidity and 7% mortality. Therefore, the possibility of close follow up needs to be balanced with a highly morbid surgical management in these patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3