Learning from Error in Violence Prevention: A School Shooting as an Organizational Accident

Author:

Goodrum Sarah1ORCID,Slepicka Jessie2ORCID,Woodward William1,Kingston Beverly1

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

2. The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA

Abstract

This article argues that the organizational structure and culture of schools may impede the prevention of violence in America’s schools, specifically threat assessment and management for students of concern. The data come from a qualitative case study of a school shooting where two students died; the data include deposition testimony from 12 school officials and more than 4,000 pages of school and law enforcement records. The findings illustrate the way the school’s organizational structure and culture shaped and hindered violence prevention practices. The tightly coupled guidelines for threat assessment created an institutional myth of safety and a false sense of security for the school and district, and the loosely coupled structure of the organization led educators to modify guidelines and make decisions about the student’s behavior problems and discipline without consulting others. The school’s culture of autonomy for staff and fresh start mentality for students created unintentional secrets about the history of the student’s difficulties, which gave educators little context for understanding the problem behaviors they observed and inhibited the threat assessment team’s ability to adequately evaluate and monitor those behaviors. Recommendations for building organizational structures and cultures that support violence prevention in schools are discussed.

Funder

The Denver Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Reference96 articles.

1. Alper Mariel, Glaze Lauren. 2019. Source and Use of Firearms Involved in Crimes: Survey of Prison Inmates, 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/suficspi16.pdf.

2. From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ‘Not fully coordinated’: the loosely coupled paradigm as a framework for understanding relationships of educators in teacher education programmes;Journal of Education for Teaching;2023-12-28

2. Who Is Supposed to Teach Us About This?;Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership;2023-06-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3