Educational Reforms and Inequalities in Israel: The MMI Hypothesis Revisited

Author:

Ayalon Hanna1,Shavit Yossi2

Affiliation:

1. Hanna Ayalon, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University. Her main field of interest is sociology of education. She is currently working on a book about curriculum differentiation and inequality in Israel and is studying the effects of high school characteristics on students' secondary and postsecondary education.

2. Yossi Shavit, Ph.D., is Chair of the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University. His main fields of interest are sociology of education and social stratification. With a large team of international scholars, he is engaged in a comparative study on the expansion, differentiation, and stratification of higher education in 15 countries.

Abstract

Israeli secondary school students sit for national matriculation examinations that result in their receiving either a plain or a university-qualifying diploma. During the 1990s, the Ministry of Education implemented policies that were designed to raise eligibility rates for the diploma. This article evaluates the consequences of these policies for gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequalities in the odds of obtaining the two forms of the diploma. The results show that the reforms reduced socioeconomic inequalities in the odds of obtaining the plain diploma but increased inequalities in the odds of obtaining the university-qualifying diploma. Overall, the results refute the prediction of Raftery and Hout's (1993) hypothesis of maximally maintained inequality that inequalities are maintained as long as privileged groups have not reached saturation vis-à-vis an educational level. Rather, they are consistent with Lucas's (2001) claim that the differentiation of a given educational credential can substitute qualitative inequalities for quantitative ones.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Cited by 144 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3