Four Galore? The Overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group Typology and Other Highly Cited Social Science Classifications

Author:

Verweij Marco1,Alexandrova Petya2,Jacobsen Henrik3,Béziat Pauline4,Branduse Diana5,Dege Yonca6,Hensing Jakob7,Hollway James8,Kliem Lea9,Ponce Gabriela4,Reichelt Inga10,Wiegmann Mareile11

Affiliation:

1. Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany

2. European Asylum Support Office, Grand Harbour Valletta, Malta

3. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

4. ETH Zurich, Zurich, ZH, Switzerland

5. Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

6. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London, UK

7. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

8. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland

9. Institute for Ecological Economy Research, Berlin, Germany

10. University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

11. Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Recently, neuroscientists have argued that elementary ways of organizing, perceiving, and justifying social relations lurk behind the diversity of social life. In developing grid-group typology, anthropologist Mary Douglas proposed such universal forms. If these are universal, then we could expect other widely cited classifications to overlap with grid-group typology. We tested this expectation by examining to which extent the elements of Douglas’s typology overlap with those of 39 highly influential classifications proposed since 1970. We established overlap by calculating the interrater agreement among 11 coders. Fair to good interrater agreement, despite a complex coding exercise and minimal training, suggests that such overlap exists. Nevertheless, limits to our research design call for further studies. These findings should contribute to a rekindling of the question whether universal forms of organizing and perceiving social relations exist and to a further consideration of whether Douglas has managed to uncover these.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3