Affiliation:
1. University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Over the past two decades, industrial relations scholarship has observed a trend towards an increasingly punitive industrial environment along with the ‘re-regulation’ of labour law. Absent from much of this literature, however, has been an empirical and historical measurement or comparison of the scale and quality of this systemic change. By surveying coercive and penal federal industrial legislation over the period 1901–2020, this study shows empirically that over the last 40 years, there has been a steep increase in the amount of coercive federal labour legislation in Australia. It further measures and compares the volume of coercive labour legislation enacted specifically against ‘labour’ and ‘capital’ or both throughout the same period (1901–2020). Analysis reveals a correlation between a high volume of coercive labour legislation with low levels of trade union power and organisation. Argued here is that coercive labour legislation has been crucial to transitioning from a liberal conciliation and arbitration model of Australian industrial relations towards a neoliberal framework of employment legislation. In the former, regulation was more collective, informal and egalitarian (embodied by the sociological concept of ‘associative democracy’). Under a neoliberal framework, regulation is now more individualised, technical, punitive and rarely enforced, resulting in less equal material outcomes.
Subject
Industrial relations,Business and International Management
Reference66 articles.
1. THE COMMONWEALTH CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT 1928.
2. Austin A (2019) Corporate profits and government spending boom while wages and economy languish. Michael West Independent Media, 5 September. Available at: www.michaelwest.com.au/corporate-profits-and-government-spending-boom-while-wages-and-economy-languish/ (accessed 11 March 2021).
3. Australian Building and Construction Commission Annual Report, 2018-19, Australian Government, Canberra.