Nursing Perspectives on the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Faulds Eileen R.12ORCID,Dungan Kathleen M.23ORCID,McNett Molly14,Jones Laureen5,Poindexter Norma6,Exline Matthew7,Pattison Jillian8,Pasquel Francisco J.9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA

2. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

3. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA

4. Implementation Science, Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA

5. Critical Care Nursing, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

6. Division of Critical Care, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

8. Ohio Health Endocrinology, Columbus, OH, USA

9. Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid implementation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although rarely reported, perceptions from nursing staff who used the systems are critical for successful implementation and future expanded use of CGM in the inpatient setting. Methods: A 22-item survey focused on CGM use was distributed to ICU nurses at two large academic medical centers in the United States in 2022. Both institutions initiated inpatient CGM in the spring of 2020 using the same CGM+point of care (POC) hybrid protocol. The survey employed a 1- to 5-point Likert scale regarding CGM sensor insertion, accuracy, acceptability, usability, training, and perceptions on workload. Results: Of the 71 surveys completed, 68 (96%) nurses reported they cared for an ICU patient on CGM and 53% reported they had independently performed CGM sensor insertion. The ICU nurses overwhelmingly reported that CGM was accurate, reduced their workload, provided safer patient care, and was preferred over POC glucose testing alone. Interestingly, nearly half of nurses (49%) reported that they considered trend arrows in dosing decisions although trends were not included in the CGM+POC hybrid protocol. Nurses received training through multiple modalities, with the majority (80%) of nurses reporting that CGM training was sufficient and prepared them for its use. Conclusion: These results confirm nursing acceptance and preference for CGM use within a hybrid glucose monitoring protocol in the ICU setting. These data lay a blueprint for successful implementation and training strategies for future widespread use.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Bioengineering,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3