The Need to Calculate Target Glucose Levels When Measuring Changes in Insulin Sensitivity During Interventions for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

Author:

Othman Nor Azlan1,Docherty Paul D.2,Krebs Jeremy D.3,Bell Damon A.4,Chase J. Geoffrey2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Permatang Pauh, Penang, Malaysia

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

3. Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand

4. School of Medicine and Pharmacology Royal Perth Hospital Unit, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Abstract

Background: Physiological models that are used with dynamic test data to assess insulin sensitivity (SI) assume that the metabolic target glucose concentration ( GTARGET) is equal to fasting glucose concentration ( G0). However, recent research has implied that irregularities in G0 in diabetes may cause erroneous SI values. This study quantifies the magnitude of these errors. Methods: A clinically validated insulin/glucose model was used to calculate SI with the standard fasting assumption (SFA) G0 = GTARGET. Then GTARGET was treated as a variable in a second analysis (VGT). The outcomes were contrasted across twelve participants with established type 2 diabetes mellitus that were recruited to take part in a 24-week dietary intervention. Participants underwent three insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IM-IVGTT) at 0, 12, and 24 weeks. Results: SIVGT had a median value of 3.36×10−4 L·mU−1·min−1 (IQR: 2.30 – 4.95×10−4) and were significantly lower ( P < .05) than the median SISFA (6.38×10−4 L·mU−1·min−1, IQR: 4.87 – 9.39×10−4). The VGT approach generally yielded lower SI values in line with expected participant physiology and more effectively tracked changes in participant state over the 24-week trial. Calculated GTARGET values were significantly lower than G0 values (median GTARGET = 5.48 vs G0 = 7.16 mmol·L−1 P < .001) and were notably higher in individuals with longer term diabetes. Conclusions: Typical modeling approaches can overestimate SI when GTARGET does not equal G0. Hence, calculating GTARGET may enable more precise SI measurements in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and could imply a dysfunction in diabetic metabolism.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Bioengineering,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3