Respiratory muscle pressures in non-CF bronchiectasis: Repeatability and reliability

Author:

Moran F.1,Piper A.2,Elborn JS3,Bradley JM4

Affiliation:

1. University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland,

2. University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

3. Centre for Infection and Immunity, Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland

4. University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland

Abstract

Background: Respiratory muscle strength is used diagnostically in clinical practice and as an outcome measure in clinical trials in various chronic lung diseases. There is limited data on its repeatability in people with non-CF bronchiectasis. The aim of the present study was to assess the repeatability of maximal inspiratory (P Imax) and expiratory pressures (PEmax) in a group of patients with stable, moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis. Methods: Twenty participants with stable moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis were recruited. Respiratory muscle strength measurements (three maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures) were made on 2 separate days. A standard protocol was used, including practice tests, before obtaining three technically acceptable and reproducible readings with a difference of 10% or less between values. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00487149. Results: The mean (SD) age of the non-CF bronchiectasis group was 63 (9) years. Maximal inspiratory pressures were repeatable with mean (SD) for highest PImax, Test 1 and Test 2, 75.90 (20) and 79.40 (19) cmH2O, and limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2SD) —3.50 ± 20 cmH2O, (p = 0.14). Maximal expiratory pressures differed significantly with mean (SD) for highest PEmax, Test 1 and Test 2, 102.25 (27) and 112.30 (32) cmH 2O, and limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2SD) —10.10 ± 35 cmH2O, (p = 0.02). The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) for highest PImax and PEmax was 0.93 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.96), respectively. Conclusion: Maximal inspiratory pressure measurements were repeatable during a period of clinical stability in moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis, suggesting this may be a useful outcome measure in non-CF bronchiectasis. Once a baseline has been established, a second visit is not required. PEmax was not a repeatable measure and further study is necessary to ascertain how much practice testing is required to obtain an accurate value.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3