Long-term oxygen therapy: review from the patients’ perspective

Author:

Cullen DL1,Stiffler D1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Health, Indiana University, School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Abstract

Chronic respiratory conditions are responsible for increasing numbers of patients in need of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). However, many patients do not use their oxygen as prescribed. Unless we can assist these patients in living with oxygen therapy, optimal clinical outcomes will not be achieved. We conducted a meta-synthesis of qualitative research studies. We included any qualitative study that focused on the psychosocial nature or experience of patients prescribed LTOT. Four research studies met the conditions of our search. We performed a rigorous methodological protocol for meta-synthesis as described by the Joanna Briggs Institute. A total of 12 findings formulated four themes. These themes included the following: adapting oxygen to life’s circumstances, living in a restricted world, self-management is fostered by oxygen, and submission and dependency. From the four thematic categories established, meta-synthesis resulted in two major results: persons prescribed oxygen rationalize its use while negotiating lifestyle interference and physical restrictions and the drive to care for one’s self is conflicted. This meta-synthesis showed that each oxygen user faces tremendous physical, psychological, and emotional challenges. They strive to adapt and maintain mastery but eventually oxygen dependency results. These challenges affect the patient’s ability to adhere to their treatment guidelines. These barriers and challenges are seldom addressed and are under-treated. Clinicians involved in LTOT need to be aware and work with the patients to facilitate their use of oxygen. Inclusion of the patients’ perspective can guide practice and assist with the development of new interventions and management strategies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3