Affiliation:
1. Department of Information Science Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire LE11 3TU United Kingdom
2. Department of Information Science Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire LE11 3TU United Kingdom,
Abstract
This paper presents a user-centred design and evaluation methodology for ensuring the usability of IR interfaces. The methodology is based on sequentially performing: a competitive analysis, user task analysis, heuristic evaluation, formative evaluation and a summative comparative evaluation. These techniques are described, and their application to iteratively design a prototype IR interface, which was then evaluated, is described. After each round of testing, the prototype was modified as needed. The user-centred methodology had a major impact in improving the interface. Results from the summative comparative evaluation suggest that users’ performance improved significantly in our prototype interface compared with a similar competitive system. They were also more satisfied with the prototype design. This methodology provides a starting point for techniques that let IR researchers and practitioners design better IR interfaces that are both easy to learn to use and remember. The paper concludes with some principles of interface design for IR systems.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Prototyping for user involvement activities: How to achieve major benefits;CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology;2021-05
2. Usability evaluation of a library website with different end user groups;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2018-05-28
3. Geographic Information Retrieval:
Progress and Challenges in Spatial
Search of Text;Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval;2018
4. Seeking Serendipity;Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval;2016-07-07
5. Novice and experienced users’ search performance and satisfaction with Web of Science and Scopus;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2016-07-06