Professional associations and ethical issues in LIS

Author:

Oppenheim Charles1,Pollecutt Natalie2

Affiliation:

1. Loughborough University,

2. Reading University Library

Abstract

Presents a literature review covering the ethical principles of librarianship and codes of ethics or conduct in the context of professional associations in the field of librarianship and information science. Describes and compares the history of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Library Association (LA) with particular reference to selected, recent ethical issues. Reports results of a questionnaire survey, to examine the attitudes and actions of the ALA, LA and Institute of Information Scientists (IIS). One questionnaire survey was sent to the chief executives of the three associations, while another was sent to certain elected Council members of each body. Three main areas were investigated: ethical issues of current concern to the library associations; level of help provided by the library associations to their members; and level of help given to those members of the associations experiencing specific ethical problems. Other questions concerned self-regulation, discipline and future ethical considerations. Results indicate that the ALA has been noticeably more active than the LA in ethical matters and has defended both librarians and users through its battles over loyalty oaths, the Library Awareness Programme and the social responsibilities of librarians. The Library Association only started addressing ethical issues after its centenary, possibly due to the LA having had less cause to fight for major intellectual freedom causes but more likely because it has chosen a less combative role for itself, due partly to the different political and social environment in the UK and partly to its status as a charity. Sets out recommendations for the ALA and LA for the future.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference105 articles.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3