Novel triangle method for evaluation of fracability in transitional shale: Case study from well ZXY-1 in the southern North China Basin

Author:

Chen Shijing123ORCID,Li Pei4,Qin Liling5,Zhang Jinchuan12,Li Zhiguo6,Shi Miao7

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Key Lab of Unconventional Natural Gas Geological Evaluation and Development Engineering, School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China

2. Key Lab of Strategy Evaluation for Shale Gas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing, China

3. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

4. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (SINOPEC), Beijing, China

5. Institute of Geology of the Second Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hebei, China

6. Bayan Project Department of the Second Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hebei, China

7. School of gemology and materials science, Hebei GEO University, Hebei, China

Abstract

Fracability is a property widely used to evaluate whether reservoirs can effectively fracture to increase production capacity. The brittleness index, which is used to evaluate reservoir fracability, is calculated via various methods, and the evaluation process of the brittleness index is complicated and not sufficiently intuitive. Thus, we used triangle method to evaluate reservoir fracability. The shale composition is classified into strong (quartz + pyrite), moderate (carbonate + plagioclase + siderite), and poor (clay + TOC + porosity) fracability based on the mechanical parameters of each shale component, which were integrated as the endpoints of the triangle method. Meanwhile, the triangle method is divided into four fracability evaluation grades: strong (I), moderate (II), weak (III) and poor (IV) fracability; each major evaluation grade has four sub-categories: best for fracturing (1), better for fracturing (2), poor for fracturing (3) and worst for fracturing (4). The triangle method is simpler and more convenient than the conventional method, dividing the fracability evaluation grades more specifically. The difference in fracability between samples can be shown intuitively, which enhances the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation of transitional shales and provides theoretical support for reservoir reconstruction.

Funder

2021 Graduate Innovation Fund Project of China University of Geosciences, Beijing

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China

National Science and Technology Major Project

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Fuel Technology,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3