‘Someone must do it’: multiple views on family’s role in end-of-life care – an international qualitative study

Author:

Tripodoro Vilma A.123ORCID,Veloso Verónica I.42,Víbora Martín Eva5ORCID,Kodba-Čeh Hana6,Bakan Miša6,Rasmussen Birgit H.78,Zambrano Sofía C.910,Joshi Melanie11,Hálfdánardóttir Svandis Íris12,Ásgeirsdóttir Guðlaug Helga12,Romarheim Elisabeth13,Haugen Dagny Faksvåg1314,McGlinchey Tamsin15,Yildiz Berivan16,Barnestein-Fonseca Pilar517,Goossensen Anne18,Lunder Urška6,van der Heide Agnes16

Affiliation:

1. Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Bonpland 2287, Ciudad de Buenos Aires (1425), Argentina

2. Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas Alfredo Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

3. ATLANTES Global Observatory of Palliative Care, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

4. Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

5. Fundación Cudeca, Malaga, Spain

6. University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Research Department, Golnik, Slovenia

7. Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Sweden

8. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Sweden

9. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

10. University Centre for Palliative Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

11. Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

12. Palliative Care Unit, Landspitali – The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik Iceland

13. Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

14. Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

15. Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

16. Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

17. Instituto IBIMA – Plataforma Bionand, Málaga, Spain

18. University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Family is a crucial social institution in end-of-life care. Family caregivers are encouraged to take on more responsibility at different times during the illness, providing personal and medical care. Unpaid work can be overburdening, with women often spending more time in care work than men. Objectives: This study explored multiple views on the family’s role in end-of-life care from a critical perspective and a relational autonomy lens, considering gender in a socio-cultural context and applying a relational autonomy framework. It explored patients, relatives and healthcare providers’ points of view. Design: This qualitative study was part of the iLIVE project, involving patients with incurable diseases, their relatives and health carers from hospital and non-hospital sites. Methods: Individual interviews of at least five patients, five relatives and five healthcare providers in each of the 10 participating countries using a semi-structured interview guide based on Giger–Davidhizar–Haff’s model for cultural assessment in end-of-life care. Thematic analysis was performed initially within each country and across the complete dataset. Data sources, including researchers’ field notes, were translated into English for international collaborative analysis. Results: We conducted 158 interviews (57 patients, 48 relatives and 53 healthcare providers). After collaborative analysis, five themes were identified across the countries: family as a finite care resource, families’ active role in decision-making, open communication with the family, care burden and socio-cultural mandates. Families were crucial for providing informal care during severe illness, often acting as the only resource. Patients acknowledged the strain on carers, leading to a conceptual model highlighting socio-cultural influences, relational autonomy, care burden and feminisation of care. Conclusion: Society, health teams and family systems still need to better support the role of family caregivers described across countries. The model implies that family roles in end-of-life care balance relational autonomy with socio-cultural values. Real-world end-of-life scenarios do not occur in a wholly individualistic, closed-off atmosphere but in an interpersonal setting. Gender is often prominent, but normative ideas influence the decisions and actions of all involved.

Funder

ILIVE Project, Live well, die well This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3