‘It’s not just about me’: a qualitative study of couples’ narratives about home death when one of the partners is dying of cancer

Author:

Aurén-Møkleby Margareta1ORCID,Thoresen Lisbeth2ORCID,Mengshoel Anne Marit2ORCID,Solbrække Kari N.2ORCID,Aasbø Gunvor3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1089 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway

2. Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

3. Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Background: Most cancer patients state a preference for home death. Care and support from primary caregivers are important to enable dying at home. A preference for home death from the perspective of couples has rarely been investigated. Objectives: To explore how a preference for home death is understood and enacted in couples where one of the partners is dying of cancer. Design: A qualitative interview research design with a narrative approach was used. Methods: Five couples participated in dyad interviews. During the analysis, two interviews that particularly illuminated couples’ shared and individual views were chosen as the primary cases. Results: The interviews show, in two highly different ways, how a preference for home death is a significant relational matter. The interviews are presented as two cases: ‘Struggles in an Unknown Terrain’ and ‘Reliance at the Kitchen Table’. They show how a preference for home death can be understood and enacted as a struggle or as reliance based on the couple’s shared biography and the partner’s ability to care for the partner during the end-of-life phase. The analysis highlighted the negotiations that underpin a preference for home death. In these negotiations, the couples drew on idealised understandings of home death. These ideas were supported by cultural values related to autonomy and independence as well as participation and citizenship. Thus, in the negotiations about being cared for and caring, legitimate dependency and the maintenance of a reciprocal relationship were balanced. The presence of healthcare professionals and medical devices in the home had to be balanced with the need to maintain a sense of self and an authentic home. Conclusion: A relational perspective on a preference for home death made us attentive to couples’ negotiations. These negotiations give couples the opportunity to re-evaluate and reconfirm individual and mutual needs in the end-of-life phase.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Reference54 articles.

1. Preferred Place of Death in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2. Where Do Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Prefer to Die and What Are the Determinants of a Preference for a Home Death?

3. End-of-life care: Where do cancer patients want to die? A systematic review

4. Regjeringen. Meld. St. 24 (2019–2020). Lindrende behandling og omsorg. Vi skal alle dø en dag. Men alle andre dager skal vi leve, 2020, https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.st.24-20192020/id2700942/

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3