Engaging and supporting the public on the topic of grief and bereavement: an evaluation of Good Grief Festival

Author:

Selman Lucy E.1ORCID,Turner Nicholas2,Dawson Lesel3ORCID,Chamberlain Charlotte4,Mustan Aisling5,Rivett Alison6ORCID,Fox Fiona7

Affiliation:

1. Palliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK

2. Bristol Population Health Science Institute and Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

3. Department of English, School of Humanities, Faculty of Arts, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

4. Palliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

5. Wild Thing Productions Ltd, Bristol, UK

6. Public Engagement, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

7. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Abstract

Background: Good Grief Festival was originally planned as a face-to-face festival about grief and bereavement. Due to COVID-19, it was held online over 3 days in October 2020. Objective: To evaluate the festival’s reach and impact. Design: Pre/post evaluation Methods: Pre-festival online surveys assessed reasons for attending and attitudes to bereavement across four items (fear of saying the wrong thing, avoiding talking to someone bereaved, knowing what to do if someone bereaved was struggling, knowing how to help). Post-festival online surveys evaluated audience experiences and the four attitude items. Free-text responses, analysed using thematic analysis, generated suggestions for improvement and general comments. Results: Between 5003 and 6438 people attended, with most attending two to five events. Pre-festival survey participants ( n = 3785) were mostly women (91%) and White (91%). About 9% were from Black or minoritised ethnic communities. About 14% were age ⩾65 years, 16% age ⩽34 years. Around 75% were members of the public, teachers, students or ‘other’; 25% academics, clinicians or bereavement counsellors. A third had been bereaved in the last year; 6% had never been bereaved. People attended to learn about grief/bereavement (77%), be inspired (52%) and feel part of a community (49%). Post-festival participants ( n = 685) reported feeling part of a community (68%), learning about grief/bereavement (68%) and being inspired (66%). 89% rated the festival as excellent/very good and 75% agreed that they felt more confident talking about grief after attending. Higher ratings and confidence were associated with attending more events. Post-festival attitudes were improved across all four items ( p < 0.001). Attendees appreciated the festival, particularly valuing the online format, opportunities for connection during lockdown and the diversity and quality of speakers. Suggestions included improving registration, more interactive events and less content. Conclusion: Good Grief Festival successfully reached a large public audience, with benefit in engagement, confidence and community-building. Evaluation was critical in shaping future events. Findings suggest festivals of this nature can play a central role in increasing death- and grief-literacy within a public health approach.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Reference48 articles.

1. Bereavement and palliative care: A public health perspective

2. National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. What is public engagement? https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/about-engagement/what-public-engagement (2020, accessed 19 January 2023).

3. A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Minority Research Participation Among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Grief and Collaborative Storytelling: The Colours of Loss;Journal of Creativity in Mental Health;2024-05-11

2. Spiritual Care for the Bereaved;Spiritual Care in Palliative Care;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3