Gendered relations to working time and union agreements

Author:

Willis Eileen1,Henderson Julie2,Toffoli Luisa3,Walter Bonnie3

Affiliation:

1. Social Health Sciences, Flinders Prevention, Promotion and Primary Health Care, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Sturt Building, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia,

2. Public Health, Flinders Prevention, Promotion and Primary Health Care, School of Medicine, Health Science Building, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia

3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide 5001, Australia

Abstract

The intensification of working time is a major impediment to the recruitment and retention of nurses worldwide. This article examines the outcomes of negotiations between the Australian Nursing Federation (South Australia), the major nursing union and the South Australian Government, with a particular focus on working-time tools introduced to deintensify nurses’ labour. The article compares two strategies negotiated by the union: one for public sector nurses working in acute hospitals where the throughput of patients is short term, the other in the community sector where most patients have chronic mental or physical conditions and their care requirements are long term. The outcomes of the two tools for reducing work intensification reflect gendered relations to time, but are contradictory in terms of control over the labour process. The tool used in the acute sector is highly successful in reducing work intensity but shifts control of the labour process to management. The community-based tool provides nurses with control over the labour process, but is less successful in reducing work intensification or working hours.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference34 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modeling Missed Care: Implications for Evidence‐Based Practice;Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing;2018-03-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3