Affiliation:
1. Association of American Colleges and Universities; Queens University, NC, USA
Abstract
The banality of evil (Arendt) remains controversial and useful. Ironically, the concept is now itself a banality. To revisit and extend it, we consider the evil of banality, the profound dangers of clichéd thoughtlessness . A distinction is proposed: intensive versus extensive evils. The former takes few people and is readily romanticized as demonic. The latter takes many people over time and is badly misunderstood if romanticized: it requires many reliable workers. The paper introduces the continuum of attentiveness in relation to the doing of evil or good (from Eichmann and Saddam Hussein’s obtuse thoughtlessness, to the poet Wislawa Szymborska’s astonishment at the ordinary). Education, especially in the Humanities, may be our last best hope to teach people to think, to see, and to resist the evils enabled by banality.
Subject
Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Education
Reference11 articles.
1. Arendt H, Kohler L, Saner S (1992) Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers Correspondence 1926–1969New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献