Affiliation:
1. Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Abstract
I argue that racial profiling gives minority groups reason to perceive a threat of violence and wrongful arrest when interacting with the criminal justice system, consequently leading them to engage in self-limiting conduct in order to avoid being profiled. As a result, they may ultimately exercise a de facto second-class citizenship status through a limited exercise of basic rights and access to public services. This would suggest, contra consequentialist defenders of the practice, that a public ban on profiling would serve to contain an important, but often overlooked source of racial injustice and that a thorough cost–benefit analysis should include these costs.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Muslim men and women’s perception of discrimination, hate crimes, and PTSD symptoms post 9/11.
2. The Modern and the Political Pluralist Perspectives on Political Authorities
3. Amnesty International (2020) US Law Enforcement Violated Black Lives Matter Protesters’ Human Rights, 4 August. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/08/usa-law-enforcement-violated-black-lives-matter-protesters-human-rights/ (accessed 20 November2021).
4. “The White Space”
5. Belkhir JA (2001) Marxism Without Apologies: Integrating Race, Gender, Class; A Working Class Approach. Race, Gender & Class 8 (2): 142–171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41674975