Surgical therapy and approaches

Author:

Anselmo G.1,Lembo A.2,Maccatrozzo L.1,Merlo F.1,Fandella A.1,Graziotti P.2,Tura M.2

Affiliation:

1. Divisione Urologica - Ospedale Regionale - Treviso

2. Divisione Urologica - Ospedali Riuniti - Bergamo

Abstract

— In the field of upper urinary tract neoplasms there is a need to find a logical linear connection between staging and treatment with surgery performed according to the gravity of the neoplasm. The Authors consider the basic concepts of surgery, discussing the access route and best operation for each clinical situation plus the advantages and disadvantages. The case histories relating to 181 operated patients from the Treviso and Bergamo Units are reported, (141 total nephroureterectomies – of whom 14 with simultaneous cystectomy, 3 nephrectomies in high-risk patients, 6 pyelectomies or heminephrectomies, 19 segmental ureterectomies and 12 endourological procedures). Conservative therapy (rather than endourology) through segmental ureterectomy with removal of the bladder cuff and ureterocystoneostomy was preferred in neoplasms of the distal ureter. In fact, in these cases survival is in relation to the tumour stage and not the type of operation. Cases are reported where conservation of the renal emunctory necessitates conservative treatment. Results of radical therapy (80% of patients, justified by the high malignancy and multifocality of the neoplasms) showed recurrence in the bladder in 28%, contralaterally in 2% and a 5-year survival rate (according to Kaplan-Meyer) of 66%. With conservative treatment there was a high rate of local recurrences (33%) in the upper tract, but only 11 % after segmental ureterectomy for tumours of the pelvic ureter. In the Authors’ experience, total nephroureterectomy guarantees maximum extirpation whereas conservative surgery is the only form of treatment allowing complete tumour removal while maintaining, even if only partially, a renal emunctory.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3