Assessing pentafecta outcomes post radical cystectomy: A tertiary care center study

Author:

Singh Vikram1ORCID,Sarangi Shakti Swarup1ORCID,Bhirud Deepak Prakash1ORCID,Sharma Kartik1ORCID,Tripathi Shashank Shekhar1,Choudhary Gautam Ram1,Singh Mahendra1ORCID,Navriya Shiv Charan1,Sandhu Arjun Singh1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Introduction: Bladder cancer is a common and serious disease globally, often requiring radical cystectomy as the preferred treatment. However, this procedure carries substantial risks and complications. To evaluate its success, pentafecta, a five-component measure, was introduced. This study investigates the attainment of pentafecta following radical cystectomy and examines factors that influence its achievement. Methodology: This retrospective, single-group study was conducted at AIIMS Jodhpur. The study population included 42 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Various data, including demographic characteristics, clinical features, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes, were collected from medical records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of achieving pentafecta, which comprises five parameters. Results: Out of 42 patients, 26 (61.9%) achieved pentafecta. Age, gender, comorbidities and surgical approach did not significantly affect the attainment of pentafecta. Negative surgical margins were achieved in 95.2% of cases, and adequate lymph node dissection (>16 lymph nodes) was performed in 85.7% of cases. The absence of Clavien-Dindo grade 3–5 complications and recurrence was observed in 80.9% and 90.47% of cases, respectively. Uretero-enteric stricture was absent in 95.2% of cases. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the significance of negative surgical margins, thorough lymph node dissection, absence of complications, recurrence, and uretero-enteric strictures in evaluating the success of radical cystectomy as pentafacta outcomes. Patients with higher drain output and wound infections are less likely to achieve pentafacta outcome and indicates poorer outcome. By considering these factors, clinicians can assess patient outcomes and identify areas for improvement.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today, https://gco.iarc.fr/today (2018, accessed 1 May 2019).

2. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update

3. WCRF International. Bladder cancer statistics. WCRF International, https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/bladder-cancer-statistics/ (2022, accessed 15 May 2023).

4. Cancer.org. Bladder cancer risk factors. Cancer.org, https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/bladder-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html (accessed 15 May 2023).

5. Management of invasive bladder cancer in patients who are not candidates for or decline cystectomy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3