Affiliation:
1. National Research Nuclear University «MEPhI»
Abstract
Today, the «Proryv» project is developing effective methods of reprocessing irradiated nuclear fuel (SNF) to return long-lived radionuclides to the fuel cycle to close it. One of the challenges of closed fuel cycle development is the reprocessing of highly active nitric acid raffinates from the PUREX-process. To achieve this task, it is necessary to separate americium-241 from liquid radioactive waste. When processing and fractionating liquid radioactive waste, extraction and sorption technologies for the extraction, purification and concentration of radionuclides are widely used. The highest efficiency and selectivity in the extraction processes of actinoids (III) and lanthanides (III) with rare earth elements (REE) and transplutonium elements (TPE) from nitric acid solutions of spent nuclear materials reprocessing were shown by extractants based on N, N, N', N'-tetraoctyldiglycolamide (TODGA). Before using a solid-phase extractant based on TOGDA, the ions of the substance in solution must be converted to neutral complexes or other non-dissociated compounds. This can be achieved by adding neutral salts to the solution, which reduce the solubility of the elements to be separated, shift the extraction distribution and significantly increase the extraction efficiency. The extracted substance is extracted in the form of a new phase - solid precipitate, liquid or gas phase, and in the case of liquid extraction there is an increase in the capacity of the extractant for the target component. Therefore, the addition of salts-salting agents to the aqueous phase to increase the ionic strength of the solution increases the distribution coefficients of extracted substances, which in turn increases the capacity of sorbents. The purpose of this work is to study the process of salting out of americium-241 during sorption using an experimental modified sample of solid-phase extractant based on TODGA in the studied model solutions of liquid radioactive waste with a uranium macrocomponent for different NaNO3 contents. The study revealed that the highest distribution coefficients for the sorption of americium-241 and uranium were obtained in a solution containing 100 g/l NaNO3, but for uranium this effect is much less pronounced than for americium-241. During the study of the sorption kinetics of americium-241 and uranium, the salting effect was revealed, which is confirmed by the values of the equilibrium concentrations of americium-241 and uranium in solution at the same time point but with different NaNO3 concentrations. The difference in the equilibrium concentrations for americium-241 was an order of magnitude towards its decrease when NaNO3 concentration was increased up to 100 g/litre. The use of this effect makes it possible to obtain the maximum capacity for americium-241 in the system with uranium macrocomponents
Publisher
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Adamov E.O., Mochalov Y.S., Rachkov V.I., Khomyakov Yu.S., Shadrin A.Yu. et al. Spent nuclear fuel reprocessing and nuclear materials recycling in two-component nuclear energy. Atomic energy. 2021;130:29–35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10512-021-00769-w
2. Adamov E.O., Kashirskii A.A., Murav'ev E.V., Tolstoukhov D.A. Struktura i parametry dvukhkomponentnoi yadernoi energetiki pri perekhode k zamykaniyu yadernogo toplivnogo tsikla. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Energetika. 2016;5:14–32. EDN: WRJCHH. Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26931859_70056435.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2023).
3. Adamov E.O., Aleksakhin R.M., Bol'shov L.A., Dedul' A.V., Orlov V.V. i dr. Proekt «Proryv» – tekhnologicheskii fundament dlya krupnomasshtabnoi yadernoi energetiki. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Energetika. 2015;1:5–13. EDN TLUFGN. Rezhim dostupa: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23112795_31777322.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2023).
4. Shadrin A.Y., Ivanov V.B., Skupov M.V., Troyanov V.M., Zherebtsov A.A. Comparison of closed nuclear fuel cycle technologies. Atomic Energy. 2016;(121):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0171-2
5. Myasoedov B.F. Kalmykov S.N., Shadrin A.Yu. Khimicheskie tekhnologii zamykaniya yadernogo toplivnogo tsikla. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2021;(91)5:459–469. EDN: UHXNNP. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321050170