Anxiety and coping during COVID-19. Investigation of anxiety management types in a German and Polish sample

Author:

Mueller-Haugk SebastianORCID,Bidzan-Bluma IlonaORCID,Bidzan-Wiącek MonikaORCID,Bulathwatta Darshika ThejaniORCID,Stueck MarcusORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThe study aimed to assess the differences in anxiety management types between German and Polish samples. The research was conducted in the context of health-related variables and anxiety management types during the period of March to April 2020. The research project was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Gdansk, Poland.Participants and procedureGerman Sample: Consisted of 323 subjects with an average age of 46 years. 73% were females, and 26% were males. Polish Sample: Included 100 subjects with an average age of 42 years. 73% were females, and 27% were males. The study collected data on various health-related variables and anxiety management types using specific measurement procedures.ResultsThere were significant differences in the frequency distribution of anxiety management types between the Polish and Ger-man samples (p < .001). In the Polish sample, 60% showed negative anxiety management types (Sensitizer, Repressor, Highly anxious), compared to the German sample with 52%. 40% of the Polish and 48% of the German sample showed positive expressions. There were stronger significant differences in both samples regarding health-related variables, with the Polish sample being at a disadvantage.ConclusionsThe study provides a comprehensive insight into the anxiety management types between German and Polish samples, re-vealing distinct differences in their responses. The Polish sample exhibited a higher prevalence of negative anxiety manage-ment types compared to the German sample. These disparities can be attributed to a myriad of factors, including historical traumas, transgenerational experiences, and the influence of dominant religions in each country. The findings underscore the importance of considering cultural, historical, and religious contexts when assessing and addressing mental health and cop-ing mechanisms across different populations. Further research with larger samples and diverse groups could offer a more nuanced understanding of these patterns and their underlying causes.

Publisher

Termedia Sp. z.o.o.

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference49 articles.

1. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. Jossey-Bass.

2. Antonovsky, A. (1997). Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit [Salutogenesis: Demystifying health]. German Society for Behavioral Therapy.

3. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly

4. Gesundheits- und soziodemographische (sozialepidemiologische) Indikatoren in der Gesundheits- und Sozialberichterstattung

5. A Polish and German Population Study of Quality of Life, Well-Being, and Life Satisfaction in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3