Analysis of Differences in Running Demands between Official Matches and Transition Games of Young Professional Soccer Players according to the Playing Position

Author:

Asian-Clemente Jose AntonioORCID,Rabano-Muñoz Alberto,Suarez-Arrones LuisORCID,Requena BernardoORCID

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the running demands of transition games (TGs) and official matches, analysing their requirements according to the performance of each position. An observational design was used to examine the activity of 20 soccer players during official matches and TGs. GPS technology was used to monitor the total distance covered (DC), distance at speeds between 14–17.9 km·h−1, 18–21 km·h−1, and above 21 km·h−1, peak speed, accelerations and decelerations above 2.5 m·s−2, and Player Load for both activities. All players were assigned to groups: centre-backs (CBs), fullbacks (FBs), defensive midfielders (DMFs), offensive midfielders (OMFs), wide midfielders (WMFs) and strikers (Ss). TGs showed greater total DC, DC 14–17.9 km·h−1, DC 18–21 km·h−1, DC >21 km·h−1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 m·s−2, and Player Load (p < 0.01). CBs, FBs and Ss showed more DC, DC 14–17.9 km·h−1, DC 18–21 km·h−1, DC >21 km·h−1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 m·s−2 and Player Load in TGs (p < 0.01). In the midfielder positions, transition game players showed greater DC 18–21 km·h−1, DC >21 km·h−1, accelerations and decelerations >2.5 m·s−2 than in matches (p < 0.05). DMFs showed higher total DC (p < 0.05) and WMFs greater DC and DC 14–17.9 km·h−1 (p < 0.01) in these drills. During transition games CBs showed greater DC 14–17.9 km·h−1 than FBs, and greater DC than Ss (p < 0.05). FBs performed more decelerations >2.5 m·s−2 than DMFs and OMFs (p < 0.05). TGs produced a homogenized load in soccer players, independent of their position, which exceeded the external load of official matches.

Publisher

Termedia Sp. z.o.o.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3