Gezamenlijke reflectie over ethische twijfel met CURA: een laagdrempelig instrument voor moreel beraad

Author:

van Schaik M.,Froyen G.

Abstract

Joint reflection on moral doubts with CURA: a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument Healthcare providers frequently encounter morally challenging situations. Clinical ethics support helps them to navigate in these complex situations by fostering reflection and generating new insights and courses of action. CURA is an instrument developed to provide low-threshold support in situations that evoke moral doubt. This article presents a case study to illustrate how CURA works and to underline the benefits it can bring to healthcare providers. The case involves a woman with Alzheimer’s disease exhibiting restlessness at night, disrupting the sleep of other clients of the residential care center. The night shift nurses want the situation to be resolved, for instance through measures such as fixation. The dementia case manager, however, advocates for an approach that meets her values and the needs of all participants. This case discussion highlights the significance of joint reflection with clinical ethics support: provide good care through generating new courses of action together and reduce moral distress by sharing moral doubts. CURA is one of the methods that can be used to achieve these goals.

Publisher

Universa BV

Reference13 articles.

1. 1. Morley G, Ives J, Bradbury-Jones C, Irvine F. What is ‘moral distress’? A narrative synthesis of the literature. Nurs Ethics 2019; 26: 646-662.

2. 2. van de Camp CPM, Brom L, Dijxhoorn AF, Metselaar S. Kennissynthese: de evenwichtige zorgverlener in palliatieve zorg. IKNL/PZNL, 2021.

3. 3. Molewijk AC, Abma T, Stolper M, et al. Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 120-124.

4. 4. Widdershoven G, Molewijk B. Philosophical foundations of clinical ethics: a hermeneutic perspective. In: Schildmann G, Vollmann J. Clinical ethics consultation. Theories and methods, implementation, evaluation. Farnham (UK): Ashgate Publishing, 2010: 37-51.

5. 5. De Snoo-Trimp JC, Molewijk AC, Ursin G, et al. Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation. Nurs Ethics 2020; 27: 390-406.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Digitale werktuigkist met ethische overlegmethoden in de zorg;Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde;2024-04-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3