Abstract
Title: Diagnostic validity of the concept Pathological Demand Avoidance: a systematic review
Background: Much is to be discussed about the evidence, positioning and usefulness of the concept Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA). The concept of PDA envelopes a behavioural pattern of resistance to meet ordinary demands of life and the usage of manipulative strategies in order to achieve this; a superficial sociability, lability of mood, obsessive behaviour and fallback into role play as a coping strategy. Until now, the validity of this concept has not been systematically reviewed.
Method: This review researches the different aspects of validity based on the five phases by Robins and Guze and a supplementary section about treatment guidelines. A systematic search has been conducted to find relevant studies concerning the validity of PDA using the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Full articles with a study design or case reports, published in a peer-reviewed journal were included.
Results: 12 relevant study designs and 6 case reports were found. Regarding the two common symptomatic descriptions of PDA no operationalization nor cluster analytic studies were found. Two PDA-related measurement instruments are described. They demonstrated a good internal consistency, but are not validated by research in an independent clinical population. The PDA-dimension correlates with other dimensions of psychopathology (ASD, personality factors and ADHD). However, the positioning of PDA (within the Autism spectrum, as a combination of comorbid factors or as a unique diagnosis) remains unclear. Regarding other domains of validity, as regarding treatment response, insufficient conclusive research has been conducted.
Conclusion: Insufficient arguments have been found in the current literature to perceive PDA as a valid concept. At first, cluster analytic studies about the symptoms need to be conducted. A valid definition and delineation regarding PDA is critical to conduct further research to other domains of validity.
Reference28 articles.
1. 1. Newson E, Le Maréchal K, David C. Pathological demand avoidance syndrome: A necessary distinction within the pervasive developmental disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(7):595–600.
2. 2. Newson E, Le Maréchal K. Pathological demand avoidance syndrome: discriminant functions analysis demonstrating its essential differences from autism and Asperger’s syndrome. In: Shattock P, Linfoot G, editors. Psychobiology of autism: current research and practice. University of Sunderland, UK; 1998.
3. 3. The National Autistic Society. Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/topics/diagnosis/pda/parents-and-carers
4. 4. O’Nions E, Gould J, Christie P, Gillberg C, Viding E, Happé F. Identifying features of ‘pathological demand avoidance’ using the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders (DISCO). Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25(4):407–19.
5. 5. Egan V, Linenberg O, O’Nions E. The Measurement of Adult Pathological Demand Avoidance Traits. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(2):481–94.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献