Hoe zorgvuldig worden voorschriften voor opioïden opgesteld? Een analyse van 1.000 voorschriften uitgevoerd in Belgische openbare apotheken

Author:

Ekstein Y.,Jans D.,Pieters L.,De Loof H.

Abstract

Are opioid prescriptions written with care? An analysis of 1,000 prescriptions carried out in Belgian community pharmacies Opioid medicines have a specific risk-benefit ratio, which makes it absolutely necessary to prescribe them in an appropriate and careful manner. In the context of an increasing use of opioids, some quantitative and legal aspects of these prescriptions were investigated. In the wider Antwerp area, 1,178 prescriptions were analysed originating from 14 pharmacies. The majority were written electronically (74%). The sample originates mainly from general practitioners (68%), who wrote relatively more paper prescriptions (33%) than specialists (11%). Only 3% of the prescriptions made on paper met all the legal requirements, such as fully writing out digits or explicitly mentioning the posology. Electronic prescriptions scored better in this respect: the posology was missing in 14% compared to 82% of the prescriptions made on paper. The average number of DDDs (defined daily dose) of opioids included on 1 prescription was 20. The median and mean MME (morphine milligram equivalent) calculated with the prescriptions containing posology were 40 and 87 MME per day respectively. Prescriptions containing fentanyl had the highest MME, followed by oxycodone. For prescriptions containing multiple opioids, the MME increased to reach an average of 432 MME per day in the presence of 3 opioids on 1 prescription. These results show that, in the interest of patient safety, there is, on average, much room for progress in careful opioid prescribing. Legally correct prescriptions are an important and relatively easy objective. In addition, the averages of the total quantity of prescribed opioids and the frequent combination of more than 2 opioids strongly contrast with the current guidelines.

Publisher

Universa BV

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3