Barnets beste som juridisk argument i begrunnelser og beslutninger i barnevernet

Author:

Bennin Camilla

Abstract

This chapter discusses the rules of law that apply when considering the best interests of the child, and how these may actively be used as arguments in a Child Protection Services (CPS) case. The primary focus is linked to the Child Welfare Act and the decisions and justifications of the CPS; however, the goal has also been to look at the national rules in the context of human rights. This applies particularly to the best interests of the child as a basic value of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. To understand an area of law it may also be necessary to have insight on the developments in this field. Discussions are being raised about making the quality of attachment a principle in its own right, about the child’s independent right to child protection services and the child’s right to participate and have influence. New challenges have been raised in the wake of decisions by the ECHR, where several judgments have been quite critical of Norwegian child protection practices. The impending new Child Welfare Act in Norway will affect CPS’ legal basis for the decisions it makes in the future. There is much to indicate that we are living in a time when the different interpretations of the best interests of the child are emerging more clearly.

Publisher

Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3