Affiliation:
1. Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
2. School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK
Abstract
Charles Wheatstone, in his classic paper on the invention of the stereoscope, concluded “… objects whose pictures do not fall on corresponding points of the two retinæ may still appear single” (1838 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128 384). Soon after, Ernst Brücke, Alexandre Prévost, David Brewster, Joseph Towne, and Joseph LeConte all published disagreements with this conclusion. LeConte's objections were most frequent and most prolonged. To understand the basis of the disagreements, we conducted three experiments using Wheatstone's original stereograms and found that most stereograms produced depth perception with diplopia, which partially explains the consistency among his critics' conclusions. Most of the criticism at variance with Wheatstone's conclusion was based on research conducted outside Germany. We argue that LeConte's lack of knowledge of the German literature on vision research prevented him from considering investigating Wheatstone's experiment with a stereogram having a smaller disparity.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献