Large Scale Differences between Haptic and Visual Judgments of Curvature

Author:

Kappers Astrid M L1,Koenderink Jan J1,Oudenaarden Gerlene1

Affiliation:

1. Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Large systematic scale differences show up when subjects are asked to match the curvature of a haptically presented surface with a visually presented cross section. Scaling factors ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 were found. Most often (for five out of six subjects) haptically estimated curvature was overestimated relative to visual curvature. We conclude that mutually inconsistent representations of surface curvature coexist in a single observer in the haptic and visual modalities. Another conclusion can be drawn with certainty, namely that at least one of the two modalities does not provide the observer with veridical information. The results for the left and the right hand of a subject were very similar, though for two subjects there existed a small significant difference in scaling. It seems likely that the curvature representations of the two hands are not independent of one another, but our data do not permit us to be conclusive.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Haptic Perception of Edge Sharpness in Real and Virtual Environments;IEEE Transactions on Haptics;2017-01-01

2. Haptic Shape Constancy Across Distance;Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications;2014

3. Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies”;Experimental Brain Research;2012-08-25

4. Human perception of shape from touch;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2011-11-12

5. Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent;Acta Psychologica;2009-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3