Role of Chromaticity, Contrast, and Local Orientation Cues in the Perception of Density

Author:

Beaudot William H A1,Mullen Kathy T1

Affiliation:

1. McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, 687 Pine Avenue West (H4-14), Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada

Abstract

We compared the role of the red–green, blue–yellow, and luminance post-receptoral mechanisms in the perception of density. The task requires the comparison of densities between two stimuli composed of oriented bandpass elements, pseudo-randomly scattered across an area of constant size. The perception of density differences was measured by a temporal 2AFC procedure for all pairs of mechanisms and for four possible densities. We found that stimuli of identical physical densities are not perceived equally: there is a consistent bias in favour of blue-yellow stimuli which are perceived as significantly more dense than red–green and achromatic stimuli. We considered three factors that could have differentially affected the density perception of blue – yellow stimuli: an increase in the perceived size of the individual blue – yellow elements, a perceived contrast difference, and the presence of local orientation cues. We found that the increased perceived density of the blue–yellow stimuli occurred despite the fact that there was no increase in perceived size of the individual elements, and remained despite corrections for the two other factors. We conclude that the significant increase in perceived density for the blue–yellow mechanism is a global effect, associated with a perceived colour ‘melting’ of the elements in the array. Our data were fitted with the occupancy model of Allik and Tuulmets (1991, Perception & Psychophysics49 303–314) and we found that blue–yellow stimuli have a greater ‘occupancy’ than red–green or achromatic stimuli.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3