Spatial Layout and Face-to-Face Interaction in Offices—A Study of the Mechanisms of Spatial Effects on Face-to-Face Interaction

Author:

Rashid Mahbub1,Kampschroer Kevin2,Wineman Jean3,Zimring Craig4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Design, University of Kansas, 1467 Jayhawk Boulevard, Room 300, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA

2. Public Buildings Service, US General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405-0002, USA

3. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, Room 2150, 2000 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069, USA

4. College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 245 Fourth Street, Atlanta, GA 30332-155, USA

Abstract

In this paper we report a study that uses space-syntax theories and techniques to develop a model explaining how spatial layouts, through their effects on movement and visible copresence, may affect face-to-face interaction in offices. Though several previous space-syntax studies have shown that spatial layouts have significant effects on movement and face-to-face interaction in offices, none has investigated the relations among movement, visible copresence, and face-to-face interaction in offices with significantly different layouts. On the basis of statistical analyses of the spatial and behavioral data collected at four moderately large offices, this study shows that spatial layouts have consistent effects on movement, but inconsistent effects on visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; that visible copresence, not movement, is an important predictor of face-to-face interaction; that movement has negligible effects on the relationship between visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; and that functional programs have little or no effect on the culture of face-to-face interaction in these offices. Limitations of the research design for workplace study and implications of the research findings for workplace design and management are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Environmental Science,Geography, Planning and Development

Cited by 81 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Designing affective workplace environments: The impact of typology, contour, ceiling and partition height on cognitive and aesthetic appraisal;Building and Environment;2024-11

2. Local Cultures of Advice Tie Formation;Journal of Organizational Sociology;2024-05-24

3. One Size Does Not Fit All: Considering Materiality to Understand Routines in Coworking Spaces;Awakening the Management of Coworking Spaces;2023-01-24

4. The impact of indoor common spaces layout design on providing social distancing in residential complexes post COVID-19;Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences – Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi;2023

5. Influence of Office Building Design on Occupant Satisfaction;IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science;2022-11-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3