Affiliation:
1. The Psychological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
Abstract
Observers were asked to detect small violations in otherwise left-right symmetric or repeated line patterns. The decision time for symmetric patterns tended to be shorter than for repeated patterns, confirming an intuitive impression that symmetry is a very easily extracted feature, even of otherwise random patterns. The importance of the pattern midline in determining the salience of symmetry was investigated by systematically controlling the position of the violations in the patterns. Small departures from symmetry near the midline were much easier to detect than the same violations in a repeated pattern, but there were no differences where the violation was at the edge of the pattern. The salience of symmetry seems to a considerable extent to depend upon the ease of comparing spatially-contiguous elements near the midline of the pattern. However, both symmetry and departures from it are easier to detect than repetition, even when the nature of the violation is random.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology
Cited by
111 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献