The Problems of Measuring Power in Europe

Author:

Laver M1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Theory and Institutions, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, PO Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, England

Abstract

This paper compares alternative methods of measuring power in European institutions. On the one hand there is the index used by Johnston in recent articles in this Journal; on the other there is an index more typically used by political scientists. Problems of interpreting and applying each index are discussed. The conclusion is that the Shapley–Shubik power index, used by political scientists, is easier to interpret in terms of the dynamics of bargaining. The Johnston index (which is certainly easier to calculate) might function as an ad hoc empirical measure, but needs therefore to be tested.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Criticality in games with multiple levels of approval;Social Choice and Welfare;2010-08-15

2. The Ordinal Equivalence of the Johnston Index and the Established Notions of Power;Econophysics and Economics of Games, Social Choices and Quantitative Techniques;2010

3. Voting power measurement: a story of misreinvention;Social Choice and Welfare;2005-10-20

4. Postulates and paradoxes of relative voting power ? A critical re-appraisal;Theory and Decision;1995-03

5. Political Geography and Political Power;Power, Voting, and Voting Power;1981

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3