Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles
Abstract
The idea that there is a single psychophysical function which describes how the human responds to stimulus intensity is rejected. The form of any empirical function depends upon the buried yet arbitrary assumption about how the stimuli are to be measured. Because psychophysical functions have this arbitrary basis, there can be no universal law, and further, no psychophysical function can reveal a general truth about the nervous system. The power law has been inappropriately reified; the descriptive usefulness of the power function has been incorrectly extended, perhaps because simplicity is appealing.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Sensory Systems,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Ophthalmology
Cited by
115 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A unified framework for perceived magnitude and discriminability of sensory stimuli;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2024-06-10
2. On the difficulty to think in ratios: a methodological bias in Stevens’ magnitude estimation procedure;Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics;2021-03-31
3. What are we estimating when we fit Stevens’ power law?;Journal of Mathematical Psychology;2016-12
4. Bibliography;Mathematical Foundations of Image Processing and Analysis 2;2014-07-22
5. Bibliography;Mathematical Foundations of Image Processing and Analysis 1;2014-07-08