Comparative efficacy of BAU-Fowl cholera and DLS-Fowl cholera vaccines in indigenous ducks
Author:
Akter S.1, Shampa C. N.1, Islam M. A.1, Alam A. U.2, Hadiuzzaman M.3, Hossain M. T.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh 2. Upazila Livestock Officer, Chauddogram, Cumilla-3550, Bangladesh 3. Poultry consultant, Veterinary diagnostic centre, Sadar, Mymensingh-2200, Bangladesh
Abstract
Background: Duck cholera is an acute, fatal, septicemic disease of domestic ducks which is responsible for significant loss in duck population. The present study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity of two formalin killed fowl cholera vaccines (BAU-FCV and DLS-FCV) in indigenous ducks.
Methods: The experimental ducks were divided into three groups (A=15, B=15 and C =10 ducks) of which birds of Group A and Group B were inoculated with 0.5 ml of BAU-FCV and DLS-FCV, respectively through subcutaneous route at the age of 10 weeks whereas ducks of group C were kept as unvaccinated control. Booster vaccination was done with same dose and route at 14 weeks of age. Challenge infection was conducted after 2 weeks of booster vaccination.
Results: The mean PHA antibody titres on 15 days post vaccination (DPPV), 28 DPPV, 15 days postsecondary vaccination (DPSV), 28 DPSV and 15 days post challenge were 25.60 ± 3.92, 51.20 ± 7.84, 89.60 ± 15.68, 166.40 ± 38.40 and 204.80 ± 31.35, respectively in ducks of Group A whereas, the mean antibody titres in ducks of Group B were 25.60 ± 3.92, 44.80 ± 7.84, 64.00 ± 7.53,102.40 ± 15.68 and 179.20 ± 31.35 at 15 DPPV, 28 DPPV, 15 DPSV, 28 DPSV and 15 days after challenge, respectively. In this investigation, slightly higher immune responses were observed in ducks of Group A vaccinated with BAU-FCV compare to ducks of Group B vaccinated with DLS-FCV. Birds of both vaccinated groups conferred 100% protection against challenge infection with virulent Pasteurella multocida whereas, 100% mortality was observed in control ducks after challenge.
Conclusion: Both vaccines were found to be safe and effective for the vaccination of indigenous ducks against duck cholera.
Publisher
Bangladesh Society for Veterinary Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. Ahmed S. Duck Production in Bangladesh. In: Farrell DJ and Stapleton P, editors. Duck Production Science and World Practice: proceedings of a workshop at Cipanas, Bogor, Indonesia, November 18-22, 1985, University of New England, Armidale, Australia; 1986. pp. 342–345. 2. Akter S, Islam MA, Hossain MT, Begum MIA, Amin MM, Sadekuzzaman M. Characterization and pathogenicity of duck plague virus isolated from natural outbreaks in ducks of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2004; 2: 107–111. 3. BER (Bangladesh Economic Review). Contribution of livestock in national economy of Bangladesh. Ministry of Finance, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2010. 4. Economic Survey, Ministry of Finance, Government of the people Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2009. 5. Gordon RE, Jordan FT. Poultry Disease. 2nd edn. London: ELBS, Baillier Tindall; 1985. pp. 44–46.
|
|