Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Academic Freedom in the Field of Educational Sciences

Author:

Güven Aydın1ORCID,K Güngör Semra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı

2. ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and interpret academic publications related to “academic freedom” indexed in the Web of Science database using bibliometric analysis methods. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate the academic publications on the topic of academic freedom in the field of education and educational sciences, which are indexed in the WoS database. Additionally, scientific field mapping techniques were employed. A total of 579 studies on academic freedom were identified within the field of education sciences. The various maps were analyzed in terms of specific usage types, authors, works, years of publication, and authors. The research findings indicate that Philip Altbach is the most frequently cited author. The most frequently cited research is that of African Higher Education: The Challenges for the 21st Century," The most effective source is the Higher Education Journal. The most frequently cited institution is Boston College. The United States of America is the country with the highest number of citations. To contribute to the field, it is recommended to increase the research on "academic freedom" indexed in the WoS database. Increasing the number of bibliometric analysis studies in different fields will contribute to the literature.

Publisher

International e-Journal of Educational Studies

Reference25 articles.

1. Alkış, B. (2015). Akademik özgürlük [Academic freedom]. (Master’s thesis, Galatasaray University, İstanbul, Türkiye). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

2. Arslan, M. (2005). Cumhuriyet dönemi üniversite reformları bağlamında üniversitelerimizde demokratiklik tartışmaları [Discussions on democracy in our universities in the context of university reforms in the Republican period]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(18), 23-49.

3. Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2011). What are universities for?. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56 (23), 2506-2517.

4. Bağış, M. (2021). Bibliyometrik araştırmalarda kullanılan başlıca analiz teknikleri [Main analysis techniques used in bibliometric research]. In Öztürk, O. & Gürler, G. (Ed.), Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz [Bibliometric analysis as a literature review tool] (pp.97-108). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.

5. Bozkurt, S. (2012). Örgütsel demokrasiyi ve akademik özgürlüğü benimseme ve Türkiye’de uygulanabilir bulma düzeyine ilişkin öğretim elemanlarının görüşleri [Academicians’ point of view about organizational democracy and academic freedom receptivity and applicability level in Türkiye]. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3