A Network, Content, and Sentiment Analysis of Tweets about the Greek Ministries
Author:
Kotzaivazoglou Iordanis1, Pechlivanaki Ioanna1, Kydros Dimitrios2, Vrana Vasiliki1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Business Administration, International Hellenic University, Terma Magnisias, 62124, Serres, GREECE 2. Department of Economic Sciences, International Hellenic University, Terma Magnisias, 62124, Serres, GREECE
Abstract
Twitter has been widely acknowledged as a crucial platform for political communication and deliberation. In this sense, research on information extraction from Twitter is growing rapidly but usually uses sentiment analysis in various aspects. The purpose of this study is to examine the networks of Twitter interactions among formal and informal political actors, as well as to identify the key topics of discussion and the sentiments conveyed by users about the 19 Greek ministries, by proposing a combination of three methods that includes not only sentiment, but also social network and content analysis. The research findings showed that not all ministries receive equal attention, resulting in interesting differences among them. Such a study can provide insights into the public’s views, reactions, and concerns, and may help governments and/or ministries better understand and align their policies and communication with them. In addition, the proposed framework offers a multifaceted exploration of Twitter interactions, discussions, and sentiments that may be applied virtually in every large-scale, public or private organization.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference79 articles.
1. Edgerly, S., Thorson, K., Bighash, L., & Hannah, M., Posting about politics: Media as resources for political expression on Facebook, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vol 13, No. 2, 2016, pp. 108–125. 2. Bossetta, M., The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 95, No.2, 2018, pp. 471-496 3. Quintana, A., Urquía-Grande,E. & Jalón, M., Strategic Conceptual Theories and Sustainable Cooperation Among Stakeholders in Egovernment, E-participation, and Social Media, Central European Journal of Public Policy, Vol 16, No 2, 2022, pp.46-63. 4. Gonçalves, G., Political Communication. In R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Strategic Communication, pp. 1-9, Wiley, 2018. 5. Eldridge II, S. A., García-Carretero, L., & Broersma, M., Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter, Media and Communication, Vol. 7, No.1, 2019, pp. 271–285.
|
|