Factors Affecting Teachers' Integration of Visualization Technology in Geometry: PLS-SEM Analysis
Author:
Yahya Faridah Hanim1, Jamil Mohd Ridhuan Mohd1, Othman Mohd Syaubari1, Shuib Tajul Rosli1, Murtafiah Wasilatul2
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Human Development, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA 2. Mathematics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas PGRI Madiun, INDONESIAN
Abstract
Visualization is identified as a crucial element that affects students' performance in Geometry. Technology plays an important role to assist weak students in visualizing concepts in Geometry. Teachers need proper planning in teaching to help their students in understanding the concepts. This study used partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses to verify the effects of variables on teachers’ intention of integrating visualization technology in teaching geometry. The model consists of four constructs: teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools and teaching aids, and assessment. The research instrument consisted of 30 survey questions for four main constructs: teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools, and teaching aids and assessment. The questionnaires were distributed to 180 teachers who teach Mathematics in secondary schools. The study used a PLS-SEM modeling tool to analyze data for reliability and validity. Results show that teaching strategy, teaching activity, selection of media, tools and teaching aids, and assessment significantly influence the integration of visualization technology in Geometry. This finding is a reference for policymakers and implementers to improve the quality of teaching and learning in Geometry for secondary schools.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
General Engineering,General Computer Science
Reference49 articles.
1. H. Crompton, M. R. Grant, and K. Y. H. Shraim, Technologies to enhance and extend children’s understanding of geometry: A configurative thematic synthesis of the literature, Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2018, pp. 59–69. 2. M. Kmetová, and Z. Nagyová Lehocká, Using tangram as a manipulative tool for transition between 2D and 3D perception in geometry. Mathematics, Vol. 9, No.18, 2021, assist students pp. 2185. 3. K. Gravemeijer, M. Stephan, C. Julie, F. L. Lin, and M. Ohtani, What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 15, 2017, pp. 105-123. 4. National report TIMSS 2019, trends in international mathematics and science study. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, 2020. Laporan kebangsaan TIMSS 2019, trends in international mathematics and science study. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2020. https://www.moe.gov.my/muatturun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/rujukanakademik/3918-buku-laporan-timss-2019/file 5. A. Muhamad, S. Murtono, and Y. Gui, The effect of manipulative pbl model on the understanding mathematic concepts for elementary students, Asian Pendidikan, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2021, pp. 17-22.
|
|