Determinants of Knowledge Transfer in Egocentric Networks. Comparative Analysis of Professions

Author:

Fryczyńska Marzena1

Affiliation:

1. Collegium of Business Administration Warsaw School of Economics Al. Niepodległości 162, 02-554 Warsaw POLAND

Abstract

This paper investigates determinants of knowledge transfer in egocentric networks of knowledge recipient and knowledge provider, what is crucial to knowledge management in organisations. Knowledge transfer is assumed to depend on knowledge work, networking competence, and the subject’s profession: teacher, Information Technology (IT) professional, or physician. The paper reports result of a quantitative study among samples of mentioned professionalists. Regression models testing, including mediation and moderation, were performed. The findings indicate that knowledge transfer in the egocentric network of the knowledge recipient increases along with knowledge work, but only when it is mediated by networking competence. Analyses in each profession support a partial mediation in the case of IT professionals and teachers. Knowledge transfer in egocentric network of the knowledge provider increases along with knowledge work of the provider. In the case of physicians, knowledge transfer in the providers’ and recipients’ knowledge networks is affected neither by knowledge work nor by networking competence.

Publisher

World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management

Reference68 articles.

1. Alba R. D., Taking stock of network analysis: A decade’s results. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 1, 1982, pp. 39–74.

2. Arbuckle J.L., IBM SPSS Amos 22 User’s Guide, 2013.

3. Aydogmus C., Millennial knowledge workers: The roles of protean career attitudes and psychological empowerment on the relationship between emotional intelligence and subjective career success, Career Development International, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2019, pp. 297- 314.

4. Baliński P., Krajewski R., Opinie środowiska lekarskiego o pracy zawodowej, proteście lekarzy, cyfryzacji w ochronie zdrowia oraz o badaniach opinii środowiska. Podsumowanie najważniejszych wyników, 2018 [Physicians opinions of work, physician's protest, healthcare digitization and about studies on physicians’ community. Summarization of major findings, 2018]. Naczelna Izba Lekarska, https://nil.org.pl/uploaded_files/1575629771_o sai-sondaze-2018-raport-skrocony.pdf [access: August 2020].

5. Borgatti S.P., Cross R., A., Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks, Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2003, pp 432–435.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3