Affiliation:
1. Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
The goal of this research is to conceptually unlink the relationship of MNEs, institutions and economic development, in order to shed light on how MNEs contribute to a country’s institutional development and its economic development. To achieve this goal, this paper employs a coevolutionary approach, adopting and nurturing MNEs, institutions and economic development. The paper’s goal is divided into two steps: The first step consists of the synthesis of the literature that is relevant with the coevolutionary approach, while the second involves the application of the synthesis to the emerging economy of Turkey for the period 1990–2011. Building on this foundation, the present exploratory paper’s findings indicate the following: First, economic development is a function of a dynamic process which encapsulates all the regulative and normative aspects of an economy and the interaction of exogenous and endogenous forces. Second, the Turkish economy, during the 1990– 2001 and the 2008–2011 periods experienced institutional avoidance. Furthermore, during 2002– 2007, the economy underwent a profound co–evolution process, which was accompanied with signs of institutional adaptation.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference53 articles.
1. Barro, R. Democracy and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1996, Volume 1 No. 1:1–27.
2. Kedia, B., Clampit, J., and Gaffney, N. The role of institutions and multinational enterprises in economic development, in Wood, G., and Demirbag M., (Eds), Handbook of Institutional Approaches to Internationa l Business: Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar, 2012:236-273.
3. Doh, J., Howton, S.D., and Howton, S.W. Does the market respond to institutional endorsement of social responsibility? The role of information, institutions and legitimacy, Journal of Management, 2010, Volume 36 No. 6:1461–1485.
4. Globerman, S., and Shapiro, D. Global foreign direct flows: the role of governance infrastructure, World Development, 2002, Volume 30 No 11: 1898–1819.
5. Haber, S., North, D., and Weingast, B. If economists are so smart, why is Africa so poor?’, 2003, Wall Street Journal, 30 July.